SACair Forum

Is it true about what is....

Aug 13, 2008 9:55pm
..said about Classic Army? I'm hearing a lot of things like, they brake easily, they have a lot of moving parts that shouldn't be, and that their not worth the time?
Aug 13, 2008 9:57pm
You must be more specific. Generalizations are usually myths and or out right lies.
Pygmy Militia Group
· Supreme ChancellorAug 13, 2008 9:58pm
3 years ago, yes.
HeadOnTactical.com
Aug 13, 2008 10:01pm
hey andrew didn't you say you where gonna put up a new sig. i forgot what it was though..
Aug 13, 2008 10:01pm
what i've heared from Pinnacle and Gamepod, is that there "guns ready to brake" i just wanted to see what the Sac Air Softers thought and feel about the guns that are Classic Army.
· Supreme ChancellorAug 13, 2008 10:01pm
I don't remember.
HeadOnTactical.com
Aug 13, 2008 10:03pm
[quote="Andrew"]3 years ago, yes.
I don't carry a gun to scare people.
· Supreme ChancellorAug 13, 2008 10:05pm
[quote="shadowman809"]what i've heared from Pinnacle and Gamepod, is that there "guns ready to brake" i just wanted to see what the Sac Air Softers thought and feel about the guns that are Classic Army.[/quote]
HeadOnTactical.com
Aug 13, 2008 10:05pm
[quote="Andrew"]I don't remember.[/quote]
Aug 13, 2008 10:06pm
what would you rate a CA M4?
Aug 13, 2008 10:18pm
Personally, 8/10. The metal isn't steel, but pot metal. Had issues on mine. But the Gearbox was a never fail.
Aug 13, 2008 10:32pm
It's really a matter of personal preference. There are pro's and con's to everything. CA's tend to be over hyped by a lot of players, especially the newer ones. Again if you ever here a general negative statement get the specifics. If they can't provide specifics than it's most likely false.
Pygmy Militia Group
Aug 13, 2008 10:46pm
[quote="shadowman809"]what i've heared from Pinnacle and Gamepod, is that there "guns ready to brake" i just wanted to see what the Sac Air Softers thought and feel about the guns that are Classic Army.[/quote]
SSD 177
· Supreme ChancellorAug 13, 2008 10:58pm
[quote="K12azy13astard"]Personally, 8/10. The metal isn't steel, but pot metal.[/quote]
HeadOnTactical.com
Aug 13, 2008 11:03pm
[quote="K12azy13astard"]Personally, 8/10. The metal isn't steel, but pot metal. [/quote]
· Supreme ChancellorAug 13, 2008 11:04pm
huh?
HeadOnTactical.com
Aug 13, 2008 11:11pm
the bb guns cannot be made of weapon grade metals and cannot be made to be used in normal firearms, they have to be unable to be able to fire real bullets, besides cost pot metal would break ...
· Supreme ChancellorAug 13, 2008 11:12pm
They're unable to fire real rounds by design alone. Not materials.
HeadOnTactical.com
Aug 13, 2008 11:15pm
yeah
Aug 14, 2008 4:47am
A buddy of mine ran a fakepoint on his RS ar15 for a few thousand rounds. It held its zero for while. I think the thing just broke lol.
Aug 14, 2008 5:35am
[quote="fuddruckers"]
-TruKiller-
· Supreme ChancellorAug 14, 2008 5:38am
Maybe you don't like CA receivers?
HeadOnTactical.com
Aug 14, 2008 5:41am
[quote="Andrew"]Maybe you don't like CA receivers?[/quote]
-TruKiller-
Aug 14, 2008 5:44am
also, out of every brand out there what is best to least, on your personal preference?
Aug 14, 2008 5:46am
i prefer double eagle
Aug 14, 2008 5:46am
[quote="shadowman809"]also, out of every brand out there what is best to least, on your personal preference?[/quote]
COMBAT BEARDS FTW!!! 8)
Aug 14, 2008 5:48am
[quote="TruKiller"][quote="fuddruckers"]
· Supreme ChancellorAug 14, 2008 5:49am
Both elephants.
HeadOnTactical.com
Aug 14, 2008 5:50am
[quote="Andrew"]Both elephants.
Aug 14, 2008 5:52am
[quote="souljacker"][quote="shadowman809"]also, out of every brand out there what is best to least, on your personal preference?[/quote]