JeremyKDec 16, 2002 5:08am
lets go CK. I will win.
IMPORTS or AMERICAN
JeremyKDec 16, 2002 5:14am
Those are all good cars. But what about the Supra. That is one the best cars around. But the 2003 SL 55 AMG from Mercedes is a head turner. Any one like the vets. Not a bad ride. Acura NSX. Any one ever heard of it. If not go to autotrader.com and look it up. It is an $80,000 sports car that has a good amount of power behind it. Six cil engine. But quick. Will last longer than any other car. If I could I would get one.
viperDec 16, 2002 5:39am
NSX's got smoked against dodge vipers...from the tests that i have seen both in magezines and on the track (sac race way)..both cars were fixed or supped what have you. hehe besides NSX's are cool looking thats it, if you want something with mad power in the import area SUBARU OUTBACKS hehe i have seen a 11.29 sec outback =) no nos just engine work and supercharged ..you can buy them with superchargers...
8017312 1
maca1inoDec 16, 2002 6:03am
VIPER, YOURE SAYING THAT SINCE AN NSX GOT SMOKED BY A VIPER RIGHT... DOES THAT MEAN YOU THINK ALL NSX'S ARE SLOWER THAN VIPERS???
airsoftbum2006Dec 16, 2002 6:09am
fool shut the hell up and make me a sandwhich ,LOL. subaru WRX's are sick cars. get a ford F350 with 20 inch lift and 39.5 tires. THATS A BADASS TRUCK. i know a guy that has one, although its useless for wheelin.
viperDec 16, 2002 4:48pm
ok watch the caps, i have seen a 1989 CRX hatch beat a viper..i have seen it beet and NSX i have seen the nsx with NOS get beaten by a 1969 Chevy Mali that car was just pure balls to the walls, it didnt have NOS just a phatty engine. i didnt say ALL NSX's ARE CRAPPY did i? did you see even read my post i was simply stating that any car can be made to beat another and that 80,000 bucks for an NSX is way too price while instead you can buy a luxury car....yea..
8017312 1
Mr.ReyesDec 16, 2002 9:15pm
[quote="JeremyK"]Those are all good cars. But what about the Supra. That is one the best cars around. But the 2003 SL 55 AMG from Mercedes is a head turner. Any one like the vets. Not a bad ride. Acura NSX. Any one ever heard of it. If not go to autotrader.com and look it up. It is an $80,000 sports car that has a good amount of power behind it. Six cil engine. But quick. Will last longer than any other car. If I could I would get one.[/quote]
8017312 6
arthur_tuxedoDec 16, 2002 11:33pm
As far as Ferrari goes, I'm partial to the 360 Spider.
RayDec 17, 2002 4:27am
Well I don't know man. I just drove a 700 hp Supra the other night. With that much power, I don't think anything could be too heavy. That car JAMZZZZZ!!!
8017312 Three
RayDec 17, 2002 4:32am
As far as Ferrari goes: 56' 250 California GT, 288 GTO, F40 (the ultimate sports car), and a F355 F1.
8017312 Three
Mr.ReyesDec 17, 2002 9:05am
[quote="Ray"]As far as Ferrari goes: 56' 250 California GT, 288 GTO, F40 (the ultimate sports car), and a F355 F1.[/quote]
8017312 6
arthur_tuxedoDec 17, 2002 10:18am
Oh hell. Well if we're talking about ANY Ferrari past or present then I'll go with the '68 GTO :o
maca1inoDec 18, 2002 4:16am
"the f355 f1 tranny you had to let go of the gas when you shifted. well actually who cares" WHEN I DRIVE, I ALWAYS LET GO OF THE GAS BETWEEN SHIFTS.... I THINK POWERSHIFTING IN ANY CAR WILL DEFINATELY DECREASE THE LONGEVITY.
xyclos_bDec 18, 2002 7:43am
YOu all sound like you need to get laid.
Look, I'm a politician, which means I lie, and I'm a cheat.
Mr.ReyesDec 18, 2002 5:57pm
[quote="maca1ino"]"the f355 f1 tranny you had to let go of the gas when you shifted. well actually who cares" WHEN I DRIVE, I ALWAYS LET GO OF THE GAS BETWEEN SHIFTS.... I THINK POWERSHIFTING IN ANY CAR WILL DEFINATELY DECREASE THE LONGEVITY.
8017312 6
maca1inoDec 19, 2002 3:21am
STAN, THANKS FOR CLEARING THAT UP FOR ME....
GuestDec 19, 2002 6:34am
[quote="xyclos_b"]YOu all sound like you need to get laid.
AxeDec 14, 2005 3:15am
What about sport bikes??
If you give to a charity please think of giving to one of these two charities. The Naval Special Warfare Foundation or Navy SEAL Warrior Fund.
FerrariModenaDec 14, 2005 3:24am
Yeah what about my crotch rocket? Ill beat both muscle and rice. :twisted:
GuestDec 14, 2005 3:36am
:D
AndrewN · Supreme ChancellorDec 14, 2005 3:39am
You drug up a 3 year old post?!!!!! And to post about a bike in a car thread. Good lord.
HeadOnTactical.com
FerrariModenaDec 14, 2005 3:47am
[quote="AgentOrange"]Any way you look at it, horsepower costs money. Wether you pay for the foreign tech in cc's or the American displacement in ci's, your going to pay dearly for your rush. Back in the 60's nothing foreign could compete against the muscle cars on the drag strip or the super ovals. There was some competition between the two on the road course but it was a pretty even argument swayed only by driver preference, skill and ability. In the mid 70's SCCA created a new class called CAN-AM which catered only to the foreign machines. That class died as fast as disco. Bottom line, any comparable car can compete against any other comparable car. The only difinitive difference that will seperate the two............Money and skill....[/quote]
GuestDec 14, 2005 5:11am
for newer cars i would definaly go with a import. because most newer american cars have problems with in 100,000 miles. and the imports usually get better gas mileage. but for classic cars...... im all for american muscle cars!!!! :D
FerrariModenaDec 14, 2005 5:13am
I wasnt posting about my bike, it was a joke. I was posting about my WRX.
airsoftbum2006Dec 14, 2005 5:19am
LOL this was from back in the fuggen day! when we had maybe 200 members only 15 persons games, 20 people was good. LOL. man....
GuestDec 14, 2005 5:20am
[quote="FerrariModena"]I wasnt posting about my bike, it was a joke. I was posting about my WRX.[/quote]
FerrariModenaDec 14, 2005 5:20am
O DANM I didnt even notice that! i wasnt that far back but you are right 02 wow....
sardonicDec 14, 2005 5:54am
All as i can say now is HEMI.