i dont know if someones posted something similar
quite possibly the ugliest frankengun ive ever seen, i threw up a lil in my mouth when i saw that pic, one asks why??. . . o god why??
"Hard work never killed anybody, but why take a chance?"
i like it exept for the mag well for the ar mag is still there. If they could make a bodie without it i would consider converting my m4 into that. And if they came out with an airsoft verision of it.
As much as I like the p-90 and m4. I don't like that rifle very much. To ugly for me
"We'll bomb them back to the stone age" General Curtis Lemay ,USAF
how can you guys not like the look of the gun?.... me, i think its fantastic. But i guess its all just opinionated....
that mag well would make it easy to fabricate a very functional and large shell catcher...
[quote="rap1171"]i like it exept for the mag well for the ar mag is still there. If they could make a bodie without it i would consider converting my m4 into that. And if they came out with an airsoft verision of it.[/quote]
[quote="airsoftbum2006"][quote="rap1171"]i like it exept for the mag well for the ar mag is still there. If they could make a bodie without it i would consider converting my m4 into that. And if they came out with an airsoft verision of it.[/quote]
lol but then itd be its own rifle.. the beauty is that its an upper you can slap on an AR by removing the 5.56mm upper.
Beautry is in the eye of the beholder. I infact LIKE this gun, though we prefer a rail system, than a snope.
I think it's kinda neat -- it's definitely an interesting design. I was like "Yeah why even have a mag well if the mags don't go in right there?" until it was pointed out that the brass ejects from right there. I think it's a neat gun. I don't care for the unloaded clear P90 mag...I think it needs to be black. :)
Gun control is not Crime control.