sharpshooterNov 14, 2005 4:06am
some of my friends are buging me about which brand is better (STOCK not upgraded) so what do you think out of ics tokyo marui and classic army
what stock rifles are better
matt9074Nov 14, 2005 4:08am
is there a way for me to vote? cuz if there was i would vote for classic army.i love CA. and california lol :D
Your name means nothing on the battlefield....
matt9074Nov 14, 2005 4:09am
oh wait nevermind.it let me vote after i posted.lol
Your name means nothing on the battlefield....
michaeldNov 14, 2005 4:09am
[quote="matt9074"]is there a way for me to vote? cuz if there was i would vote for classic army.i love CA. and california lol :D[/quote]
[quote="Amateur Ninja"]obviously you dont know him.
Elrand1Nov 14, 2005 4:10am
depends on what your basing your judgment on. CA's +metal body, -heavier, +higher fps, - piston seal. TM +more reliable, +lighter, -plastic body. ICS don't have much xp with.
matt9074Nov 14, 2005 4:11am
but you live in california. wait this topic is going in the wrong direction.this is a topic about which brand is the best. carry on.
Your name means nothing on the battlefield....
sharpshooterNov 14, 2005 4:13am
[quote="Elrand1"]depends on what your basing your judgment on. CA's +metal body, -heavier, +higher fps, - piston seal. TM +more reliable, +lighter, -plastic body. ICS don't have much xp with.[/quote]
michaeldNov 14, 2005 4:15am
[quote="sharpshooter"][quote="Elrand1"]depends on what your basing your judgment on. CA's +metal body, -heavier, +higher fps, - piston seal. TM +more reliable, +lighter, -plastic body. ICS don't have much xp with.[/quote]
[quote="Amateur Ninja"]obviously you dont know him.
matt9074Nov 14, 2005 4:15am
haha hell ya. CA all the way.
Your name means nothing on the battlefield....
Elrand1Nov 14, 2005 4:17am
[quote="sharpshooter"][quote="Elrand1"]depends on what your basing your judgment on. CA's +metal body, -heavier, +higher fps, - piston seal. TM +more reliable, +lighter, -plastic body. ICS don't have much xp with.[/quote]
sharpshooterNov 14, 2005 4:19am
[quote="michaeld"][quote="sharpshooter"][quote="Elrand1"]depends on what your basing your judgment on. CA's +metal body, -heavier, +higher fps, - piston seal. TM +more reliable, +lighter, -plastic body. ICS don't have much xp with.[/quote]
EasyCheese15Nov 14, 2005 4:24am
Yeah and I have had no problem with my ICS mp5 also. Its a solid
If I had two dead rats. I would cut you.
matt9074Nov 14, 2005 4:27am
ya ive heard that ics are pretty good and durable and reliable.but tm will probly always win the poll.in my opinion,pretty much everybody likes tm.the only aegs i dont like are well, cyma, and whoever makes the little mini ones.
Your name means nothing on the battlefield....
Liquid_RangerNov 14, 2005 4:35am
some of the guys on here that work at aex said they would do some work for me if needed, through the shop, but for now, its norca for me. the reason tm is so popular (in my opinon) is that they are cheap, reliable, and good guns overall. the reason i like ca and ics, is because for the price of a ca or ics with a metal body, in comparison to buying a metal body for a tm, the ca/ics is cheaper.
KahnNov 14, 2005 6:19am
I own a few TMs and CAs and a ICS. the ICS is junk in my openion the body all though it be mettal is crap it will break just as easy as a TM It never worked right out of the box it works fine now after alot of work. it sounds funny. its not worth the extra $50+. from there its a toss up between the TM and CA I carry a CA becuase of the mettal body and I got $1000+ into it. CA stock hop ups lick balls. TM stock motors for the most part lick balls EG700=ball licking. If you cahnge the respected parts with systema it comes down to how hard you play. can a plastic reciever keep up with you. To quote Ronnie (Viper) "Jimmy, you take Airsoft to the next level!" so my answer is no. but if you want to spend the Coin on a Sysema metal body and Torque up motor for your TM you have a fine piece of machinery.
richieboyNov 14, 2005 6:48am
You should refine your tread so that only people who have owned, not used, should post. I vote TM but then Ive never owned a CA. See what I mean?
In close range combat, an unsuspecting melon will get the back of its melon blown off.
sharpshooterNov 15, 2005 4:17am
[quote="Kahn"]I own a few TMs and CAs and a ICS. the ICS is junk in my openion the body all though it be mettal is crap it will break just as easy as a TM It never worked right out of the box it works fine now after alot of work. it sounds funny. its not worth the extra $50+. from there its a toss up between the TM and CA I carry a CA becuase of the mettal body and I got $1000+ into it. CA stock hop ups lick balls. TM stock motors for the most part lick balls EG700=ball licking. If you cahnge the respected parts with systema it comes down to how hard you play. can a plastic reciever keep up with you. To quote Ronnie (Viper) "Jimmy, you take Airsoft to the next level!" so my answer is no. but if you want to spend the Coin on a Sysema metal body and Torque up motor for your TM you have a fine piece of machinery.
michaeldNov 15, 2005 4:20am
[quote="sharpshooter"]
[quote="Amateur Ninja"]obviously you dont know him.
richieboyNov 15, 2005 4:53am
[quote="sharpshooter"][quote="michaeld"][quote="sharpshooter"]
In close range combat, an unsuspecting melon will get the back of its melon blown off.
michaeldNov 15, 2005 4:59am
[quote="sharpshooter"]on a styrl you cant fix the hopup and 2.5s r hard to find[/quote]
[quote="Amateur Ninja"]obviously you dont know him.
richieboyNov 15, 2005 4:59am
I must be new here...Whats a styrl or styel? I must have missed the memo.
In close range combat, an unsuspecting melon will get the back of its melon blown off.
PoeDec 4, 2005 4:47am
Why is clasic army so much more expnsive than TM if the pros + cons kind of are equal. :?
Do not fear the darkness, fear the shadows.....
PoeDec 4, 2005 4:51am
Would it be a bad idea to buy a couple of those cheap mini full auto guns for a short-range fight?
Do not fear the darkness, fear the shadows.....