Why State Legislatures Should Reject Semi-Automatic and Pump-Action Gun Bans
"Live on your feet or die living in the prone." -GySgt Newton
Word! You can also go on DOJ's site and all the facts are listed, (bullsh#t) for the reason of the guns bieng baned.
CW3
gee we live in what kind of state
"And when he gets to Heaven To Saint Peter he will tell: One more soldier reporting, Sir -I've served my time in Hell."
Thank you! I was just about to post a thread asking for info on the ban. I am doing a pesuassive essay in school on the topic and I needed some info. So thank you.
"As I walk throught the valley of the Shadow of Death I have no fear, because I am the meanest mutherf***er in the whole valley."
I have a shitload of crap on the ban. Next time out I see ya Jeff, I'll let you borrow some.
"Live on your feet or die living in the prone." -GySgt Newton
the laws were made by a select few to see how far they can strip ammendments from people and get away with it. They are trying to take that proverbial mile from the inches given to them. They do this by slowly manipulating and controlling the fears of the ignorant and then moving the ignorant people to higher pedistals of power. If used with common sense and a bit of actual research and hands on experimentation. They would actually find everything they have banned to be utterly rediculous. Handguns and hunting rifles have done more damage than assault rifles and other taboo firearms. Knives, shivs and other makeshift weapons are even higher than any other firearms. The alarming new weapon and trend is poison. With so many choices available at your local grocery store it's staggering! In a situation where no firearm was really banned, you'd be a lot less likely to see someone walking down the street with an assault rifle or a full blown machine gun because of their large size making concealabillity pretty much impossible. Machine guns in and of themselves is pretty stupid too since they really aren't very easy to wield nor very functional attempting to use without some sort of support. Either of these situations would have police on them so fast they'd be pulling the guy off the pavement. Yet knives, makeshift weaponry, or even bare hands are easy to conceal and are quite silent. You can stab a person to death without anyone even knowing you are doing it until someone finds the end of the result later. Then again, common sense and politics have never mixed very well.
[quote="Freelancer"]the laws were made by a select few to see how far they can strip ammendments from people and get away with it. They are trying to take that proverbial mile from the inches given to them. They do this by slowly manipulating and controlling the fears of the ignorant and then moving the ignorant people to higher pedistals of power. If used with common sense and a bit of actual research and hands on experimentation. They would actually find everything they have banned to be utterly rediculous. Handguns and hunting rifles have done more damage than assault rifles and other taboo firearms. Knives, shivs and other makeshift weapons are even higher than any other firearms. The alarming new weapon and trend is poison. With so many choices available at your local grocery store it's staggering! In a situation where no firearm was really banned, you'd be a lot less likely to see someone walking down the street with an assault rifle or a full blown machine gun because of their large size making concealabillity pretty much impossible. Machine guns in and of themselves is pretty stupid too since they really aren't very easy to wield nor very functional attempting to use without some sort of support. Either of these situations would have police on them so fast they'd be pulling the guy off the pavement. Yet knives, makeshift weaponry, or even bare hands are easy to conceal and are quite silent. You can stab a person to death without anyone even knowing you are doing it until someone finds the end of the result later. Then again, common sense and politics have never mixed very well.
Disclaimer: If any material or opinions within this author's post is deemed offensive to reader/s, then it is suggested by author that said "reader/s" simply get over it. It would automaticly be deemed by author that any complaints by reader/s demanding any apology or explaination is simply a waste of the author's time. The author already expresses that anyone offended by author, needs to get a life as it is the reader/s fault for taking author seriously in the first damned place.
[quote="ARES"]gee we live in what kind of state
Wiskey Tango Foxtrot....? Over.
thanks for the facts, now send those to the dipsh!t people in San Fransisco (except Mr. reyers) and thy will maybe see the light on why they are dumb. They say they are liberal by banning guns but in true theroy that is socialist by keeping the population from having basic protection right and we are called conservatives we are acctually liberals by saying that banning guns is a very socialist thing to do Bass akwards if u ask me, wel; that's my 2 cents.
[quote="ARES"]gee we live in what kind of state
"Guns don't kill people. People kill people."
john, if you have time pm me with the extra info you have. thanks
"As I walk throught the valley of the Shadow of Death I have no fear, because I am the meanest mutherf***er in the whole valley."