Hey everyone, just wondering. How do the internals of a G&G Carbine compare to the TM. I want something that shoots about 330 and thats what the G&G comes with stock. Plus it takes a 9.6 stock and i love the logo. THey both have Ver3 Gearboxes, and the G&G can take any part that the TM can. Plus the G&G has metal bodies. Are they good guns? Or should i get a TM? :?
G&G=Garbage and Garbage. TM's last forever...
DJ (Dennis)
ok cool. Well, i was going to get classic army. Metal body, upgraded already. A lot cheaper than the TM and upgrade. But i dunno. I always hear how CA eventually brake down. Like sooner than the TM. Are the parts replacable in the CA when it breaks down? And do you possibly know how long it'll last?
Almost all the parts in any gun is replaceable... I've heard of CAs breaking down too but hey if you buy from AEX and it breaks down withing a reasonable amount of time, bring it back and I think they'll fix it for free.
DJ (Dennis)
I have had both TM's and CA's. and haven't had problems with either. My CA M4 has lasted over a year now with a m120 in it, no problems at all. My CA SLR105 is about 4 months old, no problems either, but it is still stock.
Well, I know Operative-Subterfuge has a CA G36 that is upgraded to like 390 fps. A few weeks ago he was having a horrible time getting the gun to actually fire on game day. It worked for about 12 shots then would just stop. Boy was he frustrated! I believe I did hear him say "MAN! I should have just listened to Ronnie about these CA's...."
[quote="BrianBlink182"]THey both have Ver3 Gearboxes[/quote]
"Lets make like a tree and get the hell outta here."
i've heard that the G&G now have horrible internals. I dunno. I'm gettign classic army now.
The G&G carbines are crap...I had one of the first GR15 I think it was called...total crap! gears were crap..gear boxes were crap.. the metal body was sweet as were most of the parts, but the trades were crap...then there was the whole gearbox recall thing they had going on
I shoot Table Gypsies on sight!
