So I dont know a thing about about G&P as far as reliability goes. But I cant decide which of these I like more and which would be more usefull in a match as I have never been in a large match.
rap1171: "i need to call UPS and tell them to hurray the hell up"
get the cqb for close quarter games...get the SF for little longer range games...(the SF has a midlength RIS on it, so it looks like a cqb, but its longer...haha)
well ya i knew that the SF was a longer RIS but other then that the only difference seemed to be the 20fps. But i am only going to purchase one or the other due to money. So how much better would the SF be in long range? I want to get a TMP eventually and i have a WA Elite 1A on the way, so that would handle close quater. But still.
rap1171: "i need to call UPS and tell them to hurray the hell up"
It can be tough buyin mailorder because you can't actually feel the different versions in your hand.
In Pace Requiescat.
[quote="Doc_Holliday"]It can be tough buyin mailorder because you can't actually feel the different versions in your hand.
whatever you decide, i would shy away from using redwolf. they've been having issues with US customs lately...customs has been cracking down on redwolf imported guns for some reason. all the other hong kong sites should have those though.
What's a signature?
True, customs had been cracking down on Redwolf, but stuff still goes through or Redwolf corrects them.
If you are concerned with the apparently loss in FPS between the two barrel lengths, perhaps get a second hop up unit and second barrel setup, a long silencer and swap out barrels and the flash hider for the silencer before matches where you think you'll be increasing your engagement distance.
