SACair Forum

im in the market for a new gun, classic army or G&G. im open to suggestions so please let me know what you guys think

TM

LOL +1

Classic Army man. I guess I would say TM but you said G&G or CA so im gonna say CA. I don't really know that much byt when I had my CA M15a4 it was hella nice looking, never had a single problem, shot extremely well and is overall a great gun. Not saying to buy a M15a4 but just saying that I thought the CA gun was excellent.

I would go CA because the Internals aren't the best but there not terrible.They also have metal bodies so thats what I like most about them.G&G's guns I don't know that much about except they have good metal bodies.I've heard there gear boxes are not very good so thats the reason I haven't bought one.

but still.

Yea but if your planning on upgrading your gun just get a CA and replace the internals after a few months!

LOL i dose not matter that much if you are going to change out all the internals.

if you only are looking at CA to G&G go with the CA if not, TM.

CA

Burgin i never said it didn't matter.I just said that if you want a top of the line gun get a CA and upgrade the internals.I know alot of people that have CA and have had it for about 6 months withoyut any problems.i have 2 friends that had TM guns and the broke after a month.But uit was kind of there fault they fell on the gun like big dumb animals! :lol:

src

Whats SRC?

[quote="THOR"]

CA. I have a G&G m14, and its the only gun I would recommend from G&G, and I would only recommend it if you really want a nice m14 body because the marui 14's arent even to scale. But then you have to change all the internals out if you want it to last unlike a marui.

I say go with what you prefer. Test fire and check each brand and decide from what you like. You can pretty much change any internals on any gun. I've owned both and each manufacturer has its downside not to mention depending on how each gun is cared for and its upgrade. I do have one thing to say about G&Gs though and that is some stock G&G AEGs shoots harder. I purchased an RK103 and out of the box it was shooting 360 fps. My G&G soc. 16 out of the box was 380.

It's a matter of opinion. I prefer CA over TM and G&G but many people prefer TM. The only thing that is agreed upon is if your not getting an M14 then dont go with G&G.

never go with g&g even for an m14 TM m14 is one of the best airsoft gunz out there.

CA, G&G still has quality control issues with they're internals. When I got my first AEG, a UMG, I played with it for one day, and had problems. Took it back to AEX, and they replaced the bucking. Weeks later I traded it to snoopy, who, when he looked at the insides, was apauled. Nearly everything had to be replaced after one game. However SwatMonkey's RK is golden. So right now, G&G is hit or miss. I'm sticking with CA and TM ( Getting the Mp7 soon!)

Here is my .02 cents never ever buy G&G, G&P, AIM, ICS, Cyma .........

ICS....I dunno. from what I've read, they're getting better. Remember CA was like ICS a few years ago. I'd say give them a few years to mature, then we'll see.

CA. CA aegs are getting better and better. They are coming out with so many products ranging from a shitload of new AEG's, accessories, internals all kinds of crap.

I don't know much of anything but, I'm going to give advice.

TMTMTMTMTMTMTMTMTM

[quote="olskoolanarchy13"]im in the market for a new gun, classic army or G&G. im open to suggestions so please let me know what you guys think[/quote]

ya, most of the guns ive had in the last few years were franken guns based off of tm. Like my mp5, its got tm upper, CA lower and CA front end. TM gear box, with systema internals and the peopels who seen this thing in action know it is one mean machine. The rof is ungodly fast with a half decent FPS.

So Franken guns are top of the line then?Can you just buy franken internals?