Can anybody give me the pro's and con's of the Classic Army and ICS versions of the AK-74? And which to choose? I've heard that ICS has really improved their internals with the 74. But I also recall hearing somebody say the CA SLR was no good for some reason. Can anybody help me?
get a clone.
I shoot Table Gypsies on sight!
[quote="Juic3box"]Say it with me now.
I shoot Table Gypsies on sight!
Johny, you say both ICS and CA AK's are crap? What makes you say this? Have you had personal experience with either?
[quote="paratrooper"]Johny, you say both ICS and CA AK's are crap? What makes you say this? Have you had personal experience with either?[/quote]
[quote="paratrooper"]Johny, you say both ICS and CA AK's are crap? What makes you say this? Have you had personal experience with either?[/quote]
I shoot Table Gypsies on sight!
Ouch Johnny. That hurts. From my experience (about 2 1/2 years) CA gears have lasted better than ics gears. Im just comparing the two. Of course if you could get a tokyo and put a metal body that would be nice but i've had some trouble with stock tokyo gears as well.
Juic4y
i've got one and they're great.
