This thread has probably been posted before, but since my searching has not turned up anything, I'll just go for it.
TM M733 Commando: Completely upgraded gearbox, handguard RIS rail w/ vertical grip, and Walther red dot.
People say VFC is better internally, although the price is more. VFC has less aftermarket parts I think. I had a CA and it shot very well. go to aex and shoot them, then decide which one you like better
Chainyanker@gmail.com
If you have an issue with it or want to upgrade, who are you going to take it to. Make sure they service the brand and can obtain parts.
oh god this post is going to turn into the gaza strip and the west bank....
"Remember Jimmy Mackaway on the yard used to say, If you wanna be making moves on the street, have no attachments, have nothing in your life you cannot walk out on in 30 seconds flat in you spot the heat around the corner..."
Externally VFC will win hands down. It is truer to it's real steel counterpart in every way. The fit and finish is beyond comparison to the CA. Internally, however is another story. VFC has yet to establish a reliable credibility with it's HK416 internals. CA internals doesn't have a perfect track record also but they are above what VFC offers. IMHO, VFC is the better buy simply for the externals since you can fix the internals by upgrading them. But you can't for the externals.
Pygmy Militia Group
CA has a better quality gearbox.
HeadOnTactical.com
So if I'm gonna get the gearbox upgraded, I should go for the VFC?
TM M733 Commando: Completely upgraded gearbox, handguard RIS rail w/ vertical grip, and Walther red dot.