evo12Mar 27, 2008 8:47am
http://www.theqproject.com/review-caguns.shtml
Classic Army...Good From Afar?
RsyndcateDJMar 27, 2008 1:37pm
Didn't read all of it... too early in the morning... but yes, it is a good read... Some nice insight on things... I sure hope this doesn't turn into a CA vs TM debate once again... :roll:
DJ (Dennis)
evo12Mar 27, 2008 1:40pm
[quote="RsyndcateDJ"]Didn't read all of it... too early in the morning... but yes, it is a good read... Some nice insight on things... I sure hope this doesn't turn into a CA vs TM debate once again... :roll:[/quote]
AndrewN · Supreme ChancellorMar 27, 2008 3:57pm
[quote="evo12"]The guns in the test had the same gearbox parts, and CA actually had the advantage with upgraded wiring and hop chamber over a stock maruis but the overall performance went to the Marui.[/quote]
HeadOnTactical.com
evo12Mar 27, 2008 4:07pm
[quote="Andrew"][quote="evo12"]The guns in the test had the same gearbox parts, and CA actually had the advantage with upgraded wiring and hop chamber over a stock maruis but the overall performance went to the Marui.[/quote]
evo12Mar 27, 2008 4:18pm
[quote="Andrew"]Ahah. I didn't read it too hard.
K12azy13astardMar 27, 2008 6:17pm
The only issue I see in the report, is that they only looked at two rifles, with a glancing look at the second: the M4 and the CA33 (G3) They didn't go over other popular models like the G36 or the more recent AK variants (the 74). I understand that they just looked at the more popular (thus, more widely used).
