MonkeyApr 6, 2008 8:03am
Like? Dislike?
[quote="JaJaWarrior"]If I have to pick one, I like butthook best.[/quote]
AR57?
K12azy13astardApr 6, 2008 8:25am
Very nice. I'd like to see a airsoft variant. . I know someone was working on one, but I dunno if it was just one, or a pre-production that never took off?
LaatcommanderApr 6, 2008 8:36am
An airsoft version would be awesome except for the mags
U.S. Marine 0341 Infantry Mortarman
natethedarkjediApr 6, 2008 5:04pm
I think they should just use a smaller m4/16 mag to hold the ammo.
Donât ever let a candle burn down to nothing on top of an inflammable plastic box holding cans of deodorant spray and spare AK47 ammuniton.
MIGMADMAVISApr 6, 2008 10:15pm
Looks incredible!! Are these guns even out, or are they just prototypes?
dillamanjaroApr 7, 2008 5:52am
This is one of the more unusual things I have seen today.... But I kinda like it. Although it does seem like it could prove a bit of a challenge to reload.
Derp.
dillamanjaroApr 7, 2008 5:54am
Wait, nevermind. Reloads could be done without much challenge, now that I think about it.
Derp.
AndrewN · Supreme ChancellorApr 7, 2008 5:58am
[quote="Monkey"]Also...I wonder if the recoil is less because of it shooting like the P90? (shells come out of bottom, where M4 mag would go normally, loads from top) If so...this is one damned smart gun.[/quote]
HeadOnTactical.com
newmadtickApr 7, 2008 6:19am
There's no advantage of a bullpup configuration either. Long barrel, short overall length. It's just a quircky m4 imo.
Gen. George S. Patton said... Tanks. He said tanks a lot.
LaatcommanderApr 7, 2008 6:32am
[quote="newmadtick"]There's no advantage of a bullpup configuration either. Long barrel, short overall length. It's just a quircky m4 imo.[/quote]
U.S. Marine 0341 Infantry Mortarman
OsastoKarhuApr 7, 2008 6:53am
20 rounds extra? Why not just use a mag clamp or get good with Tac reloads.
"Those who wish to reap the blessings of liberty must undergoe the fatigues of supporting it."
AndrewN · Supreme ChancellorApr 7, 2008 6:57am
More rounds is better up to a certain point. That varies person to person. But you are sacrificing effectiveness I think. An AR15 in 223/556 is effective well past 300 yards. How about the 5.7mm round? And now your reloads sucks.
HeadOnTactical.com
michaeldApr 7, 2008 7:02am
I know this is real steel....
[quote="Amateur Ninja"]obviously you dont know him.
OsastoKarhuApr 7, 2008 7:21am
It'd be 22 rounds extra considering you should only load your mags with 28 rounds as opposed to the 30 everyone thinks.
"Those who wish to reap the blessings of liberty must undergoe the fatigues of supporting it."
NeoSpyd3rApr 7, 2008 7:25am
Looks tacticool but i wouldn't be inclined to use it
LaatcommanderApr 7, 2008 8:27am
[quote="OsastoKarhu"]20 rounds extra? Why not just use a mag clamp or get good with Tac reloads.[/quote]
U.S. Marine 0341 Infantry Mortarman
WorldslayerApr 7, 2008 8:49pm
[quote="LAATCommander"][quote="OsastoKarhu"]20 rounds extra? Why not just use a mag clamp or get good with Tac reloads.[/quote]
I used to work in a bank... USED TO... apparently they don't like it when you take home samples.
Tommyknocker2121Apr 7, 2008 8:49pm
Friend, while that's true to a point, all things equal, a P90 mag reload will be slower than an M4/M16 mag reload. It's just too clunky.
airsoftmodeApr 7, 2008 9:43pm
I just thew up a little in my mouth.
"Hard work never killed anybody, but why take a chance?"
OPFORApr 7, 2008 11:47pm
[quote="Andrew"]More rounds is better up to a certain point. That varies person to person. But you are sacrificing effectiveness I think. An AR15 in 223/556 is effective well past 300 yards. How about the 5.7mm round? And now your reloads sucks.