http://www.filairsoft.com/forum/showthread.php?t=15420
It's my understanding that G&G doesn't make very reliable aeg's to begin with. If not, has G&G's quality gotten better? If there internals are still as bad as I've heard from people I know that have owned there aeg's, then I would steer clear from any blowback on a G&G gun. I say this because if there guns are not very reliable then why would you want more things added to the gun, it's just one more thing to break on something that doesn't work that well to begin with. Correct me if I'm wrong about G&G's quality though.
OBAMA
Garbage and Garbage is what I call them. Thier internal work sucks however they are getting better, that being said a hooker with crabs is not that much different than a hooker with herpies. They both suck.
[quote="fuddruckers"]Garbage and Garbage is what I call them. Thier internal work sucks however they are getting better, that being said a hooker with crabs is not that much different than a hooker with herpies. They both suck.[/quote]
"The faster you finish the fight, the less kil't you'll get."
Exactly, a bad gear set can be fixed, a bad gear box is more permiment lol.
I'm interested to see how they make the blow back work. They say it's pneumatic which could be cool if it worked off the back pressure from the piston cycling. More interesting than the strap it to the piston version.
"A (automobile) cabin should be an office and the business should be driving..." Ben Wojdyla jalopnik.com
this is kinda old. the blowback doesn't look very impressive at all. basically, they but an extra cylinder on the top of the gearbox that siphons air from the piston stroke to blow the bolt backward. the thing is, the bolt is the same flimsy thin sheet of metal that's used on all m4 aegs. there's not gonna be much recoil from that and in fact you can't even see the aeg recoiling at all in the vids snoop posted. the tm ak at least had noticeable recoil in their vids.
What's a signature?